Atto 3 vs Kona comparison
By starting price alone, Kona is ₩10,970,000 cheaper. But price is not everything, so check the highlighted rows in the table below.
Atto 3 and Kona compared side by side in Cars.
Atto 3
What is good
- With subsidies it has a low price of around ₩30,000,000 and generous standard features.
What could be better
- The range is short at 321km, and the service network is not yet wide.
Kona
What is good
- A compact SUV with a roomy interior, and the hybrid has excellent fuel economy of up to 19.8km/L combined. The base trim price was lowered for the 2027 model year.
What could be better
- Upper hybrid trims are in the ₩37,000,000 range, more expensive than the Tucson gasoline, and 2nd-row space is tighter than compact SUVs.
At a glance
Highlighted rows are where they differ.
| Item | Atto 3Visit site | KonaVisit site |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | ≈$26,346.98+ (₩34,900,000)External source | ≈$18,065.42+ (₩23,930,000)Checked on official page |
| Vehicle class | Small | Small |
| Fuel | Electric | Gasoline, Hybrid |
| Domestic/imported | Imported | Domestic |
| Top price | 3,490 | 3,667 |
| Fuel/energy economy | Unverified |
|
| EV range | 321km (combined on 1 charge, based on external source) | - |
| Power | 150kW (about 204 hp), 310Nm, 60.48kWh LFP Blade battery |
|
| Seats | 5-seater | 5 |
| Price by trim | ₩34.9M 1 trims
| ₩23.9M~₩36.7M 14 trims 2.0 Gasoline
1.6 Turbo Gasoline
1.6 Hybrid
|
| Good for | Recommended for those who drive mostly in the city and want an affordable electric SUV. | 1~2 person households or newlyweds who drive mostly in the city and want a fuel-efficient compact SUV |
| Type | Cars | Cars |
| Category | SUV | SUV |
| Company | ChinaBYD | South KoreaHyundai |
| Plans | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
Prices and benefits may change. Check the official site before you pay.
Prices converted at 1 USD = ₩1,324.63 (2026-10-22). Original price shown in brackets. Taxes as listed by each provider.
Add to compare+ EV3+ Seltos+ Niro